Celeron N5095 vs m3-7Y32

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core m3-7Y32
2017
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.72
Celeron N5095
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.57
+49.4%

Celeron N5095 outperforms Core m3-7Y32 by a considerable 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N5095 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20461744
Place by popularitynot in top-10039
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core m3Intel Jasper Lake
Power efficiency36.1516.20
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date21 April 2017 (7 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281no data

Detailed specifications

Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N5095 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus typeOPIno data
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
Multiplier11no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1.5 MB
L3 cache4 MB4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N5095 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1515FCBGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N5095. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response+-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N5095 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® ME-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N5095 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N5095. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth29.861 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 615Intel UHD Graphics
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHz750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI+no data
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N5095.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes108
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

m3-7Y32 1.72
Celeron N5095 2.57
+49.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

m3-7Y32 2738
Celeron N5095 4076
+48.9%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

m3-7Y32 265
Celeron N5095 364
+37.4%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

m3-7Y32 120
+13.2%
Celeron N5095 106

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

m3-7Y32 1576
Celeron N5095 2028
+28.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.72 2.57
Integrated graphics card 1.87 5.58
Recency 21 April 2017 11 January 2021
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 15 Watt

m3-7Y32 has 275% lower power consumption.

Celeron N5095, on the other hand, has a 49.4% higher aggregate performance score, 198.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron N5095 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core m3-7Y32 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core m3-7Y32 is a notebook processor while Celeron N5095 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core m3-7Y32 and Celeron N5095, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core m3-7Y32
Core m3-7Y32
Intel Celeron N5095
Celeron N5095

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 22 votes

Rate Core m3-7Y32 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1463 votes

Rate Celeron N5095 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core m3-7Y32 or Celeron N5095, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.