Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS vs i9-13980HX

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-13980HX
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 55 Watt
29.68
+67.3%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
17.74

Core i9-13980HX outperforms Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS by an impressive 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-13980HX and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking143350
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HXAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency51.0747.97
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-HX (2023)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)13 June 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$668no data

Detailed specifications

Core i9-13980HX and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed2.2 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed5.5 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache2 MB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache36 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die size257 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-13980HX and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1964FP7/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-13980HX and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-13980HX and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-13980HX and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-13980HX and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5no data
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth89.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics for 13th Gen Intel ProcessorsAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.65 GHzno data
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i9-13980HX and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i9-13980HX and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i9-13980HX and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-13980HX and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-13980HX 29.68
+67.3%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 17.74

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-13980HX 47153
+67.4%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 28175

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i9-13980HX 4717
+99.9%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 2360

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i9-13980HX 305
+10.7%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 275

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i9-13980HX 20329
+104%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 9959

Blender(-)

i9-13980HX 106
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 214
+102%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i9-13980HX 2099
+7.3%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 1956

7-Zip Single

i9-13980HX 6972
+12.2%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 6215

7-Zip

i9-13980HX 119244
+94.5%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 61303

WebXPRT 3

i9-13980HX 337
+13.9%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 296

CrossMark Overall

i9-13980HX 2080
+33.8%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 1555

WebXPRT 4 Overall

i9-13980HX 306
+21.4%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 252

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

i9-13980HX 190
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 343
+80.5%

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

i9-13980HX 17564
+69.7%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 10348

Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core

i9-13980HX 2882
+10.6%
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS 2605

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.68 17.74
Integrated graphics card 5.58 18.32
Recency 4 January 2023 13 June 2023
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 32 16
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 35 Watt

i9-13980HX has a 67.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, on the other hand, has 228.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 months, and 57.1% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-13980HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-13980HX and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-13980HX
Core i9-13980HX
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 492 votes

Rate Core i9-13980HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 47 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-13980HX or Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.