Apple M2 Max vs i9-11900F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-11900F
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
13.98
Apple M2 Max
2023
12 cores / 12 threads, 79 Watt
16.81
+20.2%

Apple M2 Max outperforms Core i9-11900F by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-11900F and Apple M2 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking531393
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M-Series
Power efficiency20.3520.14
Architecture codenameRocket Lake (2021)no data
Release date16 March 2021 (3 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i9-11900F and Apple M2 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)3.3 MB
L2 cache256K (per core)36 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)48 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data67000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-11900F and Apple M2 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1200no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt79 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-11900F and Apple M2 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i9-11900F and Apple M2 Max technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-11900F and Apple M2 Max are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-11900F and Apple M2 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200no data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth50 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M2 Max 38-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-11900F and Apple M2 Max.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-11900F 13.98
Apple M2 Max 16.81
+20.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-11900F 22213
Apple M2 Max 26694
+20.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.98 16.81
Recency 16 March 2021 17 January 2023
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 79 Watt

i9-11900F has 33.3% more threads, and 21.5% lower power consumption.

Apple M2 Max, on the other hand, has a 20.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 50% more physical cores, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M2 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-11900F in performance tests.

Note that Core i9-11900F is a desktop processor while Apple M2 Max is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-11900F and Apple M2 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-11900F
Core i9-11900F
Apple M2 Max
M2 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 309 votes

Rate Core i9-11900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 236 votes

Rate Apple M2 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-11900F or Apple M2 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.