Core i5-13450HX vs Core i9-10900KF
Aggregate performance score
i5-13450HX outperforms i9-10900KF by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i9-10900KF and Core i5-13450HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 464 | 369 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 25.20 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Raptor Lake-HX |
| Architecture codename | Comet Lake (2020) | Raptor Lake-HX |
| Release date | 30 April 2020 (4 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i9-10900KF and Core i5-13450HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 20 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.3 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 20 MB (shared) | 20 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | no data | 257 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 72 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i9-10900KF and Core i5-13450HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1200 | BGA1964 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-10900KF and Core i5-13450HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Core i9-10900KF and Core i5-13450HX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-10900KF and Core i5-13450HX are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-10900KF and Core i5-13450HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-10900KF and Core i5-13450HX.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Core i5-13450HX outperforms Core i9-10900KF by 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i5-13450HX outperforms Core i9-10900KF by 13% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 14.60 | 16.48 |
| Recency | 30 April 2020 | 4 January 2023 |
| Threads | 20 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 55 Watt |
i9-10900KF has 25% more threads.
i5-13450HX, on the other hand, has a 12.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 127.3% lower power consumption.
The Core i5-13450HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-10900KF in performance tests.
Note that Core i9-10900KF is a desktop processor while Core i5-13450HX is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-10900KF and Core i5-13450HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
