Core i3-N305 vs Atom C3958

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3958
2017
16 cores / 16 threads, 31 Watt
2.77

i3-N305 outperforms Atom C3958 by a whopping 135% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3958 and Core i3-N305 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking16331001
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.54no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Alder Lake-N
Release date15 August 2017 (6 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom C3958 and Core i3-N305 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speedno data0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache896 KB768 KB
L2 cache16 MB4 MB
L3 cacheno data6 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature83 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3958 and Core i3-N305 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataBGA1264
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3958 and Core i3-N305. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++

Security technologies

Atom C3958 and Core i3-N305 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3958 and Core i3-N305 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3958 and Core i3-N305. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3958 and Core i3-N305.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanes169

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom C3958 2.77
i3-N305 6.51
+135%

Core i3-N305 outperforms Atom C3958 by 135% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom C3958 4281
i3-N305 10072
+135%

Core i3-N305 outperforms Atom C3958 by 135% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.77 6.51
Recency 15 August 2017 3 January 2023
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 15 Watt

Atom C3958 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

i3-N305, on the other hand, has a 135% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 106.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-N305 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3958 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom C3958 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-N305 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3958 and Core i3-N305, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3958
Atom C3958
Intel Core i3-N305
Core i3-N305

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 6 votes

Rate Atom C3958 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 511 votes

Rate Core i3-N305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3958 or Core i3-N305, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.