A8-3520M vs i7-6822EQ

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-6822EQ
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 25 Watt
3.30
+263%
A8-3520M
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.91

Core i7-6822EQ outperforms A8-3520M by a whopping 263% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-6822EQ and A8-3520M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15792527
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.34no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD A-Series
Power efficiency12.492.46
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date12 October 2015 (9 years ago)20 December 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$378no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-6822EQ and A8-3520M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache256 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size122 mm2228 mm2
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-6822EQ and A8-3520M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataFS1
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-6822EQ and A8-3520M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6620G
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Core i7-6822EQ and A8-3520M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-6822EQ and A8-3520M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-6822EQ and A8-3520M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR3-1866DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 530AMD Radeon HD 6620G (444 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-6822EQ and A8-3520M.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-6822EQ 3.30
+263%
A8-3520M 0.91

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-6822EQ 5241
+264%
A8-3520M 1441

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.30 0.91
Integrated graphics card 2.59 0.88
Recency 12 October 2015 20 December 2011
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 35 Watt

i7-6822EQ has a 262.6% higher aggregate performance score, 194.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-6822EQ is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-3520M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6822EQ and A8-3520M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-6822EQ
Core i7-6822EQ
AMD A8-3520M
A8-3520M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Core i7-6822EQ on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 103 votes

Rate A8-3520M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-6822EQ or A8-3520M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.