Celeron N5095 vs i7-620UM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-620UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.71
Celeron N5095
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.67
+276%

Celeron N5095 outperforms Core i7-620UM by a whopping 276% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-620UM and Celeron N5095 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27091725
Place by popularitynot in top-10030
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Jasper Lake
Power efficiency3.6016.23
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$278no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-620UM and Celeron N5095 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.06 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.13 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier8no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1.5 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-620UM and Celeron N5095 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288FCBGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-620UM and Celeron N5095. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
vPro+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology+-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Responseno data-
PAE36 Bitno data
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-620UM and Celeron N5095 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB+no data
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-620UM and Celeron N5095 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-620UM and Celeron N5095. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency500 MHz750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-620UM and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i7-620UM and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-620UM and Celeron N5095 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-620UM and Celeron N5095.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes168
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-620UM 0.71
Celeron N5095 2.67
+276%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-620UM 1091
Celeron N5095 4080
+274%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-620UM 2111
Celeron N5095 3545
+67.9%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-620UM 4004
Celeron N5095 12283
+207%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.71 2.67
Recency 7 January 2010 11 January 2021
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron N5095 has a 276.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N5095 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-620UM in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-620UM is a notebook processor while Celeron N5095 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-620UM and Celeron N5095, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-620UM
Core i7-620UM
Intel Celeron N5095
Celeron N5095

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 12 votes

Rate Core i7-620UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1438 votes

Rate Celeron N5095 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-620UM or Celeron N5095, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.