FX-7500 vs i7-2657M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2657M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.99
FX-7500
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 19 Watt
2.02
+104%

FX-7500 outperforms Core i7-2657M by a whopping 104% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2657M and FX-7500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24661913
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i7AMD Kaveri
Power efficiency5.5110.06
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date3 January 2011 (13 years ago)4 June 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$317no data

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2657M and FX-7500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier16no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB4096 KB
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size149 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors624 Million2,410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2657M and FX-7500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023FP3
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt19 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2657M and FX-7500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2657M and FX-7500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2657M and FX-7500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2657M and FX-7500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size8.01 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2657M and FX-7500 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i7-2657M and FX-7500 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2657M and FX-7500.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes168

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2657M 0.99
FX-7500 2.02
+104%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i7-2657M 3491
+69.5%
FX-7500 2060

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i7-2657M 6229
+13.6%
FX-7500 5482

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i7-2657M 2546
FX-7500 2771
+8.8%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i7-2657M 2
+11%
FX-7500 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.99 2.02
Recency 3 January 2011 4 June 2014
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 19 Watt

i7-2657M has 11.8% lower power consumption.

FX-7500, on the other hand, has a 104% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The FX-7500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2657M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2657M and FX-7500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2657M
Core i7-2657M
AMD FX-7500
FX-7500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 5 votes

Rate Core i7-2657M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 91 vote

Rate FX-7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2657M or FX-7500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.