Athlon 64 FX-74 vs i7-2610UE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2610UE
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.89
+45.9%
Athlon 64 FX-74
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 125 Watt
0.61

Core i7-2610UE outperforms Athlon 64 FX-74 by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2610UE and Athlon 64 FX-74 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25402784
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.020.13
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i7no data
Power efficiency4.950.46
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)November 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$317$500

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon 64 FX-74 has 550% better value for money than i7-2610UE.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2610UE and Athlon 64 FX-74 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data235 mm2
Number of transistors624 Million227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2610UE and Athlon 64 FX-74 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataF
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2610UE and Athlon 64 FX-74. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2610UE and Athlon 64 FX-74 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2610UE and Athlon 64 FX-74 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2610UE and Athlon 64 FX-74. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333DDR1
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2610UE 0.89
+45.9%
Athlon 64 FX-74 0.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2610UE 1409
+45%
Athlon 64 FX-74 972

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.89 0.61
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 125 Watt

i7-2610UE has a 45.9% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 635.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-2610UE is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 FX-74 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i7-2610UE is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 FX-74 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2610UE and Athlon 64 FX-74, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2610UE
Core i7-2610UE
AMD Athlon 64 FX-74
Athlon 64 FX-74

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Core i7-2610UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-74 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2610UE or Athlon 64 FX-74, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.