A6-7310 vs Core i5-750
Aggregate performance score
A6-7310 outperforms i5-750 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i5-750 and A6-7310 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1994 | 1949 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.17 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Core i5 (Desktop) | AMD A-Series |
| Architecture codename | Lynnfield (2009−2010) | Carrizo-L (2015) |
| Release date | 23 September 2009 (14 years ago) | 7 May 2015 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $150 | no data |
| Current price | $44 (0.3x MSRP) | $452 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i5-750 and A6-7310 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Bus support | 2500 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 296 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 73 °C | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 774 Million | 930 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i5-750 and A6-7310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 1156 | FP4 BGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 12-25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-750 and A6-7310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i5-750 and A6-7310 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-750 and A6-7310. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon R4 (Beema) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-750 and A6-7310.
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
A6-7310 outperforms Core i5-750 by 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
A6-7310 outperforms Core i5-750 by 6% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i5-750 outperforms A6-7310 by 88% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i5-750 outperforms A6-7310 by 99% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Core i5-750 outperforms A6-7310 by 92% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Core i5-750 outperforms A6-7310 by 118% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Core i5-750 outperforms A6-7310 by 89% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.64 | 1.74 |
| Recency | 23 September 2009 | 7 May 2015 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 12 Watt |
A6-7310 has a 6.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 691.7% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i5-750 and A6-7310.
Note that Core i5-750 is a desktop processor while A6-7310 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-750 and A6-7310, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
