A6-9225 vs Pentium Dual T4400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium Dual Core T4400
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.81
A6-9225
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.84
+3.7%

A6-9225 outperforms Pentium Dual Core T4400 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium Dual Core T4400 and A6-9225 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26102586
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual CoreAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency2.195.30
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date1 December 2009 (15 years ago)1 June 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium Dual Core T4400 and A6-9225 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB160 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size107 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors410 million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium Dual Core T4400 and A6-9225 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPBGA
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Dual Core T4400 and A6-9225. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Dual Core T4400 and A6-9225. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 686 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium Dual T4400 0.81
A6-9225 0.84
+3.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium Dual T4400 1284
A6-9225 1335
+4%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pentium Dual T4400 2231
A6-9225 2532
+13.5%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Pentium Dual T4400 4200
+0.2%
A6-9225 4193

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Pentium Dual T4400 1897
A6-9225 2132
+12.4%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Pentium Dual T4400 38.2
A6-9225 26.28
+45.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.81 0.84
Recency 1 December 2009 1 June 2018
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

A6-9225 has a 3.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Pentium Dual Core T4400 and A6-9225.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Dual Core T4400 and A6-9225, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400
Pentium Dual Core T4400
AMD A6-9225
A6-9225

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 219 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2301 vote

Rate A6-9225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium Dual Core T4400 or A6-9225, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.