Athlon 3000G vs i5-6400T

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-6400T
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.69
Athlon 3000G
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.82
+4.8%

Athlon 3000G outperforms Core i5-6400T by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-6400T and Athlon 3000G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16981670
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.385.27
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i5 (Desktop)AMD Athlon
Power efficiency7.277.63
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)21 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$192$49

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon 3000G has 1287% better value for money than i5-6400T.

Detailed specifications

Core i5-6400T and Athlon 3000G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0PCIe 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier2235
L1 cache256 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache6 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size122 mm2209.78 mm2?
Maximum core temperature66 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-6400T and Athlon 3000G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151AM4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-6400T and Athlon 3000G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
PowerNow-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i5-6400T and Athlon 3000G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-6400T and Athlon 3000G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-6400T and Athlon 3000G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB?
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s42.671 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 530AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency950 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i5-6400T and Athlon 3000G integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i5-6400T and Athlon 3000G integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i5-6400T and Athlon 3000G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-6400T and Athlon 3000G.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes166

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-6400T 2.69
Athlon 3000G 2.82
+4.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-6400T 4277
Athlon 3000G 4484
+4.8%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-6400T 933
Athlon 3000G 957
+2.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-6400T 2551
+30.2%
Athlon 3000G 1960

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.69 2.82
Integrated graphics card 2.59 2.98
Recency 1 September 2015 21 November 2019
Physical cores 4 2

i5-6400T has 100% more physical cores.

Athlon 3000G, on the other hand, has a 4.8% higher aggregate performance score, 15.1% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 4 years.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i5-6400T and Athlon 3000G.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-6400T and Athlon 3000G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-6400T
Core i5-6400T
AMD Athlon 3000G
Athlon 3000G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 93 votes

Rate Core i5-6400T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2093 votes

Rate Athlon 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-6400T or Athlon 3000G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.