Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) vs i5-3350P

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-3350P
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 69 Watt
2.71
+68.3%
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 125 Watt
1.61

Core i5-3350P outperforms Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-3350P and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16962088
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.25no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.701.21
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Deneb (2009−2011)
Release date3 September 2012 (12 years ago)7 November 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$292no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-3350P and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size133 mm2258 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data758 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-3350P and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155AM3
Power consumption (TDP)69 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-3350P and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Core i5-3350P and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-3350P and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-3350P and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32.23 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-3350P and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W).

PCIe version3.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-3350P 2.71
+68.3%
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) 1.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-3350P 4293
+68.8%
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) 2544

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.71 1.61
Recency 3 September 2012 7 November 2009
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 69 Watt 125 Watt

i5-3350P has a 68.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 81.2% lower power consumption.

The Core i5-3350P is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-3350P and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-3350P
Core i5-3350P
AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 232 votes

Rate Core i5-3350P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 640 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-3350P or Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.