Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS vs i5-13400F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-13400F
2023
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
15.82
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
16.83
+6.4%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Core i5-13400F by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking432393
Place by popularity46not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation58.34no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency23.0245.48
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date4 January 2023 (1 year ago)13 June 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$196no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache20 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die size257 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1700FP7/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5, DDR4no data
Maximum memory size192 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-13400F 15.82
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 16.83
+6.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-13400F 25137
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 26730
+6.3%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-13400F 2302
+3.3%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2228

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-13400F 11000
+3.5%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 10627

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i5-13400F 13989
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 14772
+5.6%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i5-13400F 2364
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 2440
+3.2%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i5-13400F 252
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 269
+6.7%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i5-13400F 12095
+9.6%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 11037

Blender(-)

i5-13400F 206
+1.5%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 203

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i5-13400F 1792
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 1888
+5.3%

7-Zip Single

i5-13400F 5743
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 6496
+13.1%

7-Zip

i5-13400F 60048
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 66442
+10.6%

WebXPRT 3

i5-13400F 294
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 363
+23.5%

CrossMark Overall

i5-13400F 1941
+19.8%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 1620

WebXPRT 4 Overall

i5-13400F 254
+5%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 242

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

i5-13400F 336
+2.8%
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 327

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.82 16.83
Recency 4 January 2023 13 June 2023
Physical cores 10 8
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

i5-13400F has 25% more physical cores.

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS, on the other hand, has a 6.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS.

Note that Core i5-13400F is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-13400F and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 3331 vote

Rate Core i5-13400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 58 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-13400F or Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.