i9-13900F vs i3-N305

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-N305
2023
8 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
6.28
Core i9-13900F
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
32.05
+410%

Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i3-N305 by a whopping 410% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-N305 and Core i9-13900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1073128
Place by popularity78not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data57.11
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiency39.6246.66
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-N (2023)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$309$524

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-N305 and Core i9-13900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed0.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache96 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per module)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-N305 and Core i9-13900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1264FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-N305 and Core i9-13900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i3-N305 and Core i9-13900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-N305 and Core i9-13900F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-N305 and Core i9-13900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16 GB192 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphicsno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHzno data
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-N305 and Core i9-13900F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-N305 and Core i9-13900F integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-N305 and Core i9-13900F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-N305 and Core i9-13900F.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes920
USB revision2.0/3.2no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-N305 6.28
i9-13900F 32.05
+410%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-N305 9980
i9-13900F 50908
+410%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.28 32.05
Physical cores 8 24
Threads 8 32
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

i3-N305 has 333.3% lower power consumption.

i9-13900F, on the other hand, has a 410.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Core i9-13900F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-N305 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-N305 is a notebook processor while Core i9-13900F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-N305 and Core i9-13900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-N305
Core i3-N305
Intel Core i9-13900F
Core i9-13900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 652 votes

Rate Core i3-N305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 158 votes

Rate Core i9-13900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-N305 or Core i9-13900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.