Celeron Dual-Core T1600 vs i3-370M

Place in the ranking	2673	2791
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Core i3	Intel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency	1.97	1.62
Architecture codename	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Merom (2006−2008)
Release date	22 June 2010 (14 years ago)	1 May 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$245	no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-370M and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	2
Base clock speed	2.4 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	0.1 GHz	1.66 GHz
Bus type	DMI 1.0	no data
Bus rate	1 × 2.5 GT/s	667 MHz
Multiplier	18	no data
L1 cache	128 KB	no data
L2 cache	512 KB	1 MB
L3 cache	3 MB (shared)	no data
Chip lithography	32 nm	65 nm
Die size	81+114 mm²	143 mm²
Maximum core temperature	90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGA	100 °C
Number of transistors	382+177 Million	291 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-370M and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	no data
Socket	PGA988	PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-370M and Celeron Dual-Core T1600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	no data
FMA	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
PAE	36 Bit	no data
FDI	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data

Security technologies

Core i3-370M and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-370M and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-370M and Celeron Dual-Core T1600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	no data
Maximum memory size	8 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	17.051 GB/s	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors	no data
Clear Video	+	no data
Clear Video HD	+	no data
Graphics max frequency	667 MHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-370M and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-370M and Celeron Dual-Core T1600.

PCIe version	2.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	16	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-370M 0.73
+21.7%

Celeron Dual-Core T1600 0.60

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-370M 1156
+21.7%

Celeron Dual-Core T1600 950

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i3-370M 6204
+107%

Celeron Dual-Core T1600 3000

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i3-370M 2578
+91%

Celeron Dual-Core T1600 1350

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.73	0.60
Recency	22 June 2010	1 May 2008
Threads	4	2
Chip lithography	32 nm	65 nm

i3-370M has a 21.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i3-370M is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-370M and Celeron Dual-Core T1600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.