A6-5357M vs i3-3217UE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-3217UE
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.86
+17.8%
A6-5357M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.73

Core i3-3217UE outperforms A6-5357M by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-3217UE and A6-5357M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25732684
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency4.791.97
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date1 August 2012 (12 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i3-3217UE and A6-5357M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size118 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3217UE and A6-5357M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA1023FP2
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3217UE and A6-5357M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3217UE and A6-5357M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3217UE and A6-5357M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknown Dual-channelDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD 4000AMD Radeon HD 8450G (533 - 720 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-3217UE 0.86
+17.8%
A6-5357M 0.73

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-3217UE 1362
+16.9%
A6-5357M 1165

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.86 0.73
Recency 1 August 2012 1 June 2013
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 35 Watt

i3-3217UE has a 17.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 105.9% lower power consumption.

A6-5357M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months.

The Core i3-3217UE is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-5357M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3217UE and A6-5357M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-3217UE
Core i3-3217UE
AMD A6-5357M
A6-5357M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Core i3-3217UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 7 votes

Rate A6-5357M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-3217UE or A6-5357M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.