Athlon 64 X2 4000+ vs i3-3217U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Core i3-3110M Core i3-3120M Core i3-3217U Core i5-3210M Core i5-3230M Core i5-3320M Core i5-3337U Core i7-3520M Core i7-3610QM Core i7-3630QM Core i7-3632QM Pentium 2020M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Athlon 64 FX-62 Athlon 64 LE-1620 Athlon 64 X2 4400+ Athlon 64 X2 4600+ Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Athlon 64 X2 4000+ Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Athlon 64 X2 5200+ Athlon 64 X2 5400+ Athlon 64 X2 5600+ Athlon 64 X2 6000+ Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-3217U
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.77
+75%
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 89 Watt
0.44

Core i3-3217U outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4000+ by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

i3-3217U i3-3217U
Athlon 64 X2 4000+ Athlon 64 X2 4000+

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-3217U and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26302947
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Power efficiency4.290.47
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)May 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-3217U and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)512K
L3 cache3 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm90 nm
Die size118 mm2220 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3217U and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1023AM2
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3217U and Athlon 64 X2 4000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-3217U and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3217U and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3217U and Athlon 64 X2 4000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4000no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3217U and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3217U and Athlon 64 X2 4000+.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-3217U 0.77
+75%
Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 0.44

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-3217U 1225
+77%
Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 692

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-3217U 293
+50.3%
Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 195

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-3217U 619
+70.5%
Athlon 64 X2 4000+ 363

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.77 0.44
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 89 Watt

i3-3217U has a 75% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 423.5% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-3217U is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-3217U is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 4000+ is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3217U and Athlon 64 X2 4000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Core i3-3217U
Core i3-3217U
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

i3-3217U Core i3 3217U
vs
i5-2537M Core i5 2537M
Athlon 64 X2 4000+ Athlon 64 X2 4000+
vs
Pentium Dual-Core E2210 Pentium Dual Core E2210
i3-3217U Core i3 3217U
vs
Core 2 Duo T9800 Core 2 Duo T9800
Xeon X5680 Xeon X5680
vs
i5-760 Core i5 760
i7-960 Core i7 960
vs
Core 2 Quad Q9500 Core 2 Quad Q9500
i7-960 Core i7 960
vs
Celeron G5905 Celeron G5905
Core 2 Duo E4600 Core 2 Duo E4600
vs
Ryzen 7 7700X Ryzen 7 7700X
i7-8700K Core i7 8700K
vs
i5-2400S Core i5 2400S
i5-4440 Core i5 4440
vs
Phenom X4 9550 Phenom X4 9550
i5-4440 Core i5 4440
vs
Phenom X4 9850B Phenom X4 9850B
i5-4440 Core i5 4440
vs
Ryzen 3 1200X Ryzen 3 1200X
Xeon E5-2680 v4 Xeon E5 2680 v4
vs
A8-8600P A8 8600P
i5-3317U Core i5 3317U
vs
A6-5357M A6 5357M

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 539 votes

Rate Core i3-3217U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 190 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-3217U or Athlon 64 X2 4000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.