A10-6700 vs Phenom II X6 1065T

Aggregate performance score

Phenom II X6 1065T
2010
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
2.21
+8.9%

Phenom II X6 1065T outperforms A10-6700 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Phenom II X6 1065T and A10-6700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18531934
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.612.85
Architecture codenameThuban (2010)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date7 December 2010 (13 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Phenom II X6 1065T and A10-6700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads64
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size346 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistors904 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X6 1065T and A10-6700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3FM2
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X6 1065T and A10-6700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-AVX
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X6 1065T and A10-6700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X6 1065T and A10-6700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1866
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 8670D
Number of pipelinesno data384
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Phenom II X6 1065T and A10-6700 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Phenom II X6 1065T and A10-6700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Phenom II X6 1065T and A10-6700.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Phenom II X6 1065T 2.21
+8.9%
A10-6700 2.03

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Phenom II X6 1065T 3387
+9.1%
A10-6700 3105

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.21 2.03
Recency 7 December 2010 1 June 2013
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 65 Watt

Phenom II X6 1065T has a 8.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

A10-6700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Phenom II X6 1065T and A10-6700.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X6 1065T and A10-6700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X6 1065T
Phenom II X6 1065T
AMD A10-6700
A10-6700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 135 votes

Rate Phenom II X6 1065T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 242 votes

Rate A10-6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X6 1065T or A10-6700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.