Celeron N6211 vs i3-1115G4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-1115G4
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 28 Watt
3.88
+169%
Celeron N6211
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.44

Core i3-1115G4 outperforms Celeron N6211 by a whopping 169% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-1115G4 and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14642197
Place by popularity55not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeElkhart Lake
Power efficiency12.8720.58
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021)Elkhart Lake (2022)
Release date2 September 2020 (4 years ago)17 July 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-1115G4 and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1.5 MB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography10 nm SuperFin10 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-1115G4 and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1449BGA1493
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-1115G4 and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i3-1115G4 and Celeron N6211 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-1115G4 and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-1115G4 and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel® ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHzno data
Execution Units48no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-1115G4 and Celeron N6211 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-1115G4 and Celeron N6211 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680x4320@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-1115G4 and Celeron N6211 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-1115G4 and Celeron N6211.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-1115G4 3.88
+169%
Celeron N6211 1.44

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-1115G4 6051
+170%
Celeron N6211 2245

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i3-1115G4 8018
+197%
Celeron N6211 2696

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i3-1115G4 16265
+247%
Celeron N6211 4693

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i3-1115G4 11.76
+322%
Celeron N6211 49.66

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i3-1115G4 481
+275%
Celeron N6211 128

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i3-1115G4 190
+150%
Celeron N6211 76

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i3-1115G4 2.8
+186%
Celeron N6211 1

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i3-1115G4 26
+162%
Celeron N6211 10

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i3-1115G4 142
+213%
Celeron N6211 45

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

i3-1115G4 2605
+209%
Celeron N6211 844

Blender(-)

i3-1115G4 1022
Celeron N6211 3767
+269%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

i3-1115G4 1312
+136%
Celeron N6211 556

7-Zip Single

i3-1115G4 4600
+77.4%
Celeron N6211 2593

7-Zip

i3-1115G4 12920
+225%
Celeron N6211 3974

WebXPRT 3

i3-1115G4 205
+129%
Celeron N6211 89

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.88 1.44
Recency 2 September 2020 17 July 2022
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 6 Watt

i3-1115G4 has a 169.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Celeron N6211, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 366.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-1115G4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N6211 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-1115G4 is a notebook processor while Celeron N6211 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-1115G4 and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-1115G4
Core i3-1115G4
Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 5329 votes

Rate Core i3-1115G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-1115G4 or Celeron N6211, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.