Celeron N6211 vs J3455

Place in the ranking	2206	2212
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.22	3.33
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Celeron	Elkhart Lake
Power efficiency	13.43	20.52
Architecture codename	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)	Elkhart Lake (2022)
Release date	30 August 2016 (8 years ago)	17 July 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$107	$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron N6211 has 1414% better value for money than Celeron J3455.

Detailed specifications

Celeron J3455 and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	2
Base clock speed	1.5 GHz	1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.3 GHz	3 GHz
Multiplier	15	no data
L2 cache	2 MB	1.5 MB
L3 cache	0 KB	no data
Chip lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	70 °C
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron J3455 and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	no data
Socket	FCBGA1296	BGA1493
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron J3455 and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
vPro	-	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Smart Response	-	no data
GPIO	+	no data
Smart Connect	-	no data
HD Audio	+	no data
RST	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron J3455 and Celeron N6211 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data
Secure Boot	+	no data
Secure Key	+	no data
Identity Protection	+	-
OS Guard	-	no data
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron J3455 and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
VT-i	-	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron J3455 and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s	DDR4
Maximum memory size	8 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	Intel HD Graphics 500	Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (250 - 750 MHz)
Max video memory	8 GB	no data
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Clear Video	+	no data
Clear Video HD	+	no data
Graphics max frequency	750 MHz	no data
Execution Units	12	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron J3455 and Celeron N6211 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	3	no data
eDP	+	no data
DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-
MIPI-DSI	+	no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron J3455 and Celeron N6211 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	+	no data
OpenGL	+	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron J3455 and Celeron N6211.

PCIe version	2.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	6	no data
USB revision	2.0/3.0	no data
Total number of SATA ports	2	no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports	2	no data
Number of USB ports	8	no data
Integrated LAN	-	no data
UART	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron J3455 1.42
+0.7%

Celeron N6211 1.41

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron J3455 2252
+0.3%

Celeron N6211 2245

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.42	1.41
Integrated graphics card	0.77	1.39
Recency	30 August 2016	17 July 2022
Physical cores	4	2
Threads	4	2
Chip lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	6 Watt

Celeron J3455 has a 0.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron N6211, on the other hand, has 80.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron J3455 and Celeron N6211.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron J3455 and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.