EPYC Embedded 8124P vs Ultra 7 265KF

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC Embedded 8124P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking88not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation98.08no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency28.13no data
Architecture codenameArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)Siena (2023−2024)
Release date24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)18 September 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$379no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC Embedded 8124P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2032
Base clock speed3.9 GHz2.45 GHz
Boost clock speed5.5 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm5 nm
Die size243 mm22x 73 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data75 °C
Number of transistors17,800 million17,750 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC Embedded 8124P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket1851SP6
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC Embedded 8124P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC Embedded 8124P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC Embedded 8124P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC Embedded 8124P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC Embedded 8124P.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes2096

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 October 2024 18 September 2023
Physical cores 20 16
Threads 20 32
Chip lithography 3 nm 5 nm

Ultra 7 265KF has an age advantage of 1 year, 25% more physical cores, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

EPYC Embedded 8124P, on the other hand, has 60% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC Embedded 8124P. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core Ultra 7 265KF is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 8124P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 265KF and EPYC Embedded 8124P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
Core Ultra 7 265KF
AMD EPYC Embedded 8124P
EPYC Embedded 8124P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 38 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 8124P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 7 265KF or EPYC Embedded 8124P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.