i5-14500 vs Ultra 7 165H

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core Ultra 7 165H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 28 Watt
16.51
Core i5-14500
2024
14 cores / 20 threads, 65 Watt
20.06
+21.5%

Core i5-14500 outperforms Core Ultra 7 165H by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core Ultra 7 165H and Core i5-14500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking403282
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data67.32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-Hno data
Power efficiency55.8429.22
Architecture codenameMeteor Lake-H (2023)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024)
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$460$232

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core Ultra 7 165H and Core i5-14500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Performance-coresno data6
Efficient-coresno data8
Threads2220
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz5 GHz
Bus rateno data154 MHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data215 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Core Ultra 7 165H and Core i5-14500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 2049FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 7 165H and Core i5-14500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core Ultra 7 165H and Core i5-14500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 7 165H and Core i5-14500 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 7 165H and Core i5-14500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory sizeno data192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU ( - 2300 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.55 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core Ultra 7 165H and Core i5-14500 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core Ultra 7 165H and Core i5-14500 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core Ultra 7 165H and Core i5-14500 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 7 165H and Core i5-14500.

PCIe version5.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ultra 7 165H 16.51
i5-14500 20.06
+21.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ultra 7 165H 26227
i5-14500 31859
+21.5%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ultra 7 165H 2641
+8.5%
i5-14500 2435

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ultra 7 165H 257
i5-14500 273
+6.2%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Ultra 7 165H 12052
+14.3%
i5-14500 10543

Blender(-)

Ultra 7 165H 246
+10.3%
i5-14500 223

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Ultra 7 165H 1794
i5-14500 1898
+5.8%

7-Zip Single

Ultra 7 165H 5273
i5-14500 6198
+17.5%

7-Zip

Ultra 7 165H 56997
+3.9%
i5-14500 54851

WebXPRT 3

Ultra 7 165H 293
+5.4%
i5-14500 278

CrossMark Overall

Ultra 7 165H 1692
+4.1%
i5-14500 1625

WebXPRT 4 Overall

Ultra 7 165H 263
+0.4%
i5-14500 262

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Ultra 7 165H 435
+9.8%
i5-14500 396

Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core

Ultra 7 165H 12231
+14.9%
i5-14500 10644

Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core

Ultra 7 165H 2422
i5-14500 2583
+6.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.51 20.06
Integrated graphics card 18.49 6.16
Physical cores 16 14
Threads 22 20
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 65 Watt

Ultra 7 165H has 200.2% faster integrated GPU, 14.3% more physical cores and 10% more threads, and 132.1% lower power consumption.

i5-14500, on the other hand, has a 21.5% higher aggregate performance score.

The Core i5-14500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 7 165H in performance tests.

Be aware that Core Ultra 7 165H is a notebook processor while Core i5-14500 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 7 165H and Core i5-14500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Ultra 7 165H
Core Ultra 7 165H
Intel Core i5-14500
Core i5-14500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 44 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 165H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 232 votes

Rate Core i5-14500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Ultra 7 165H or Core i5-14500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.