Mobile Pentium II 400 vs Ultra 3 105UL
Primary details
Comparing Core Ultra 3 105UL and Mobile Pentium II 400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Mobile Pentium II |
| Architecture codename | Meteor Lake-PS (2024) | P6 |
| Release date | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $295 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core Ultra 3 105UL and Mobile Pentium II 400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 10 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.5 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 0.4 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Multiplier | no data | 6 |
| L1 cache | 112 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 10 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 250 nm, 180 nm |
| Die size | no data | 180 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 27 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core Ultra 3 105UL and Mobile Pentium II 400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 1851 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 13.1 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Ultra 3 105UL and Mobile Pentium II 400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Core Ultra 3 105UL and Mobile Pentium II 400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Ultra 3 105UL and Mobile Pentium II 400 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Ultra 3 105UL and Mobile Pentium II 400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 Depends on motherboard | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Arc Xe-LPG 48EU | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core Ultra 3 105UL and Mobile Pentium II 400.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 8 | 1 |
| Threads | 10 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 250 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 13 Watt |
Ultra 3 105UL has 700% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 3471.4% more advanced lithography process.
Mobile Pentium II 400, on the other hand, has 15.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core Ultra 3 105UL and Mobile Pentium II 400. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core Ultra 3 105UL is a desktop processor while Mobile Pentium II 400 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core Ultra 3 105UL and Mobile Pentium II 400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
