Mobile Pentium II 400 vs 7 160UL

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 7 160UL and Mobile Pentium II 400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Mobile Pentium II
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-PS (2024)P6
Release date8 April 2024 (less than a year ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Core 7 160UL and Mobile Pentium II 400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads121
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz0.4 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Multiplierno data6
L1 cache80 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)256 KB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography10 nm250 nm, 180 nm
Die sizeno data180 mm2
Number of transistorsno data27 Million
64 bit support+-

Compatibility

Information on Core 7 160UL and Mobile Pentium II 400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket1700no data
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt13.1 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 7 160UL and Mobile Pentium II 400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Core 7 160UL and Mobile Pentium II 400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 7 160UL and Mobile Pentium II 400 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 7 160UL and Mobile Pentium II 400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5no data
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Iris Xe Graphics 96EUno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 7 160UL and Mobile Pentium II 400.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 10 1
Threads 12 1
Chip lithography 10 nm 250 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 13 Watt

7 160UL has 900% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

Mobile Pentium II 400, on the other hand, has 15.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 7 160UL and Mobile Pentium II 400. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 7 160UL is a desktop processor while Mobile Pentium II 400 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 7 160UL and Mobile Pentium II 400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 7 160UL
Core 7 160UL
Intel Mobile Pentium II 400
Mobile Pentium II 400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 7 160UL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Pentium II 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 7 160UL or Mobile Pentium II 400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.