i7-2685QM vs Solo T1200

Primary details

Comparing Core Solo T1200 and Core i7-2685QM processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore SoloIntel Core i7
Architecture codenameYonah (2005−2006)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release dateJanuary 2006 (18 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core Solo T1200 and Core i7-2685QM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads18
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rate667 MHz4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data23
L1 cache64 KB256 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB6 MB
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die size90 mm2no data
Number of transistors151 million1160 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core Solo T1200 and Core i7-2685QM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket479Socket G2
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core Solo T1200 and Core i7-2685QM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

Core Solo T1200 and Core i7-2685QM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core Solo T1200 and Core i7-2685QM are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core Solo T1200 and Core i7-2685QM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR3-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 3000

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 35 Watt

Solo T1200 has 29.6% lower power consumption.

i7-2685QM, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core Solo T1200 and Core i7-2685QM. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core Solo T1200 and Core i7-2685QM, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core Solo T1200
Core Solo T1200
Intel Core i7-2685QM
Core i7-2685QM

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate Core Solo T1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i7-2685QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core Solo T1200 or Core i7-2685QM, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.