Celeron J1900 vs M-5Y71

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core M-5Y71
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.28
+77.8%
Celeron J1900
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.72

Core M-5Y71 outperforms Celeron J1900 by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core M-5Y71 and Celeron J1900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22902698
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core MIntel Celeron
Power efficiency24.216.81
Architecture codenameBroadwell-Y (2014)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date27 October 2014 (10 years ago)1 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281$82

Detailed specifications

Core M-5Y71 and Celeron J1900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz2.42 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache64K (per core)224 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size50 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature95 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1300 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core M-5Y71 and Celeron J1900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1234FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core M-5Y71 and Celeron J1900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Smart Response+no data
PAEno data36 Bit
FDI+-
Fast Memory Access+no data
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Core M-5Y71 and Celeron J1900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core M-5Y71 and Celeron J1900 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core M-5Y71 and Celeron J1900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 5300Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHz854 MHz
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core M-5Y71 and Celeron J1900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core M-5Y71 and Celeron J1900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.42560x1600@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort2560x1600@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core M-5Y71 and Celeron J1900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core M-5Y71 and Celeron J1900.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes124

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M-5Y71 1.28
+77.8%
Celeron J1900 0.72

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

M-5Y71 2037
+77.3%
Celeron J1900 1149

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.28 0.72
Integrated graphics card 1.04 0.77
Recency 27 October 2014 1 November 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 10 Watt

M-5Y71 has a 77.8% higher aggregate performance score, 35.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 months, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

Celeron J1900, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.

The Core M-5Y71 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1900 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core M-5Y71 and Celeron J1900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core M-5Y71
Core M-5Y71
Intel Celeron J1900
Celeron J1900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 31 vote

Rate Core M-5Y71 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 197 votes

Rate Celeron J1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core M-5Y71 or Celeron J1900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.