Celeron N5095 vs Core 2 Solo U2100
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Solo U2100 and Celeron N5095 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 1660 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 43 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.81 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Core 2 Solo | Intel Jasper Lake |
| Architecture codename | Merom-L (2007) | Jasper Lake (2021) |
| Release date | no data | 11 January 2021 (3 years ago) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Solo U2100 and Celeron N5095 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.06 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Bus support | 533 MHz | no data |
| L2 cache | no data | 1.5 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Solo U2100 and Celeron N5095 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | BGA1338 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5.5 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo U2100 and Celeron N5095. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Solo U2100 and Celeron N5095. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Solo U2100 and Celeron N5095.
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Celeron N5095 outperforms Core 2 Solo U2100 by 1652% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 15 Watt |
Core 2 Solo U2100 has 200% lower power consumption.
Celeron N5095, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Solo U2100 and Celeron N5095. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core 2 Solo U2100 is a notebook processor while Celeron N5095 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Solo U2100 and Celeron N5095, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
