Turion 64 X2 TL-58 vs Core 2 Solo SU3300

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Turion 64 X2 TL-58 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 Solo2x AMD Turion 64
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Tyler (2007−2009)
Release date20 August 2008 (16 years ago)4 May 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$262no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Turion 64 X2 TL-58 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz800 MHz
L2 cache3 MB1 MB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Turion 64 X2 TL-58 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA956no data
Power consumption (TDP)5.5 Watt31 Watt

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Solo SU3300 564
Turion 64 X2 TL-58 1339
+137%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 August 2008 4 May 2007
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 31 Watt

Core 2 Solo SU3300 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 520% lower power consumption.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Turion 64 X2 TL-58. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Turion 64 X2 TL-58, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Solo SU3300
Core 2 Solo SU3300
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-58
Turion 64 X2 TL-58

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Core 2 Solo SU3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 27 votes

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-58 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Solo SU3300 or Turion 64 X2 TL-58, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.