Ryzen 5 7600X vs Core 2 Solo SU3300

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Solo SU3300
2008
1 core / 1 thread, 5 Watt
0.16
Ryzen 5 7600X
2022
6 cores / 12 threads, 105 Watt
17.93
+11106%

Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms Core 2 Solo SU3300 by a whopping 11106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Ryzen 5 7600X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3279340
Place by popularitynot in top-10069
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core 2 SoloAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency2.7516.16
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
Release date20 August 2008 (16 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$262no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Ryzen 5 7600X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads112
Base clock speedno data4.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz5.3 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data384 KB
L2 cache3 MB6 MB
L3 cacheno data32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size107 mm270 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistors410 MillionCCD: 6,5 Mrd + IOD: 3,4 Mrd Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Ryzen 5 7600X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA956AM5
Power consumption (TDP)5.5 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Ryzen 5 7600X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data5 nm, 0.650 - 1.475V
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Ryzen 5 7600X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Ryzen 5 7600X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-5200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Ryzen 5 7600X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Solo SU3300 0.16
Ryzen 5 7600X 17.93
+11106%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Solo SU3300 1247
Ryzen 5 7600X 8480
+580%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Solo SU3300 1247
Ryzen 5 7600X 49430
+3864%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Solo SU3300 564
Ryzen 5 7600X 17291
+2966%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 17.93
Recency 20 August 2008 27 September 2022
Physical cores 1 6
Threads 1 12
Chip lithography 45 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 105 Watt

Core 2 Solo SU3300 has 2000% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 7600X, on the other hand, has a 11106.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 7600X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Solo SU3300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Solo SU3300 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 7600X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Solo SU3300 and Ryzen 5 7600X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Solo SU3300
Core 2 Solo SU3300
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
Ryzen 5 7600X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Core 2 Solo SU3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2109 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Solo SU3300 or Ryzen 5 7600X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.