Xeon X3350 vs Core 2 Quad Q9500

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q9500
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.40

Xeon X3350 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9500 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Xeon X3350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22122190
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.391.41
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)1 January 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Xeon X3350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed2.83 GHz2.66 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache12 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature71 °C71 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625V0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Xeon X3350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketLGA775LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Xeon X3350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching-+
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Xeon X3350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Xeon X3350 are enumerated here.

VT-x++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q9500 1.40
Xeon X3350 1.42
+1.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q9500 2224
Xeon X3350 2263
+1.8%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Quad Q9500 364
Xeon X3350 401
+10.2%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Quad Q9500 1023
Xeon X3350 1253
+22.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.40 1.42

Xeon X3350 has a 1.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Xeon X3350.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q9500 is a desktop processor while Xeon X3350 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q9500 and Xeon X3350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q9500
Core 2 Quad Q9500
Intel Xeon X3350
Xeon X3350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 1209 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 6 votes

Rate Xeon X3350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q9500 or Xeon X3350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.