Atom C3508 vs Core 2 Quad Q6600

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Quad Q6600
4 cores / 4 threads, 105 Watt
1.15
+1.8%
Atom C3508
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 11 Watt
1.13

Core 2 Quad Q6600 outperforms Atom C3508 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Atom C3508 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23752384
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesCore 2 Quad (Desktop)Intel Atom
Power efficiency1.049.51
Architecture codenameKentsfield (2007)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Atom C3508 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
Multiplierno data16
L1 cacheno data224 KB
L2 cacheno data8 MB
L3 cacheno data8 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Atom C3508 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataFCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt11.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Atom C3508. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-

Security technologies

Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Atom C3508 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Atom C3508 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Atom C3508. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4: 1866
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data29.871 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Quad (Desktop) Q6600 and Atom C3508.

PCIe versionno data3
PCI Express lanesno data8
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data8
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data8
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Quad Q6600 1.15
+1.8%
Atom C3508 1.13

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Quad Q6600 1820
+1.3%
Atom C3508 1796

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.15 1.13
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 11 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q6600 has a 1.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom C3508, on the other hand, has a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 854.5% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Atom C3508.

Note that Core 2 Quad Q6600 is a desktop processor while Atom C3508 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Atom C3508, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Core 2 Quad Q6600
Intel Atom C3508
Atom C3508

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1763 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3508 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Quad Q6600 or Atom C3508, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.