A6-7000 vs Core 2 Extreme X7900

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Extreme X7900
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 44 Watt
0.70
+9.4%
A6-7000
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.64

Core 2 Extreme X7900 outperforms A6-7000 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme X7900 and A6-7000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27092762
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 ExtremeAMD Kaveri
Power efficiency1.513.56
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date1 September 2007 (17 years ago)1 June 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$851no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme X7900 and A6-7000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache4 MB1024 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm28 nm
Die size143 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.1V-1.375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme X7900 and A6-7000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketPPGA478FT3
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme X7900 and A6-7000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
FRTC-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
AMT+no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme X7900 and A6-7000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme X7900 and A6-7000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme X7900 and A6-7000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR3
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R4 Graphics
iGPU core countno data3
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Extreme X7900 and A6-7000 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core 2 Extreme X7900 and A6-7000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme X7900 and A6-7000.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme X7900 0.70
+9.4%
A6-7000 0.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Extreme X7900 1104
+9.3%
A6-7000 1010

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 0.64
Recency 1 September 2007 1 June 2014
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 17 Watt

Core 2 Extreme X7900 has a 9.4% higher aggregate performance score.

A6-7000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 158.8% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Extreme X7900 and A6-7000.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme X7900 and A6-7000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme X7900
Core 2 Extreme X7900
AMD A6-7000
A6-7000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 6 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme X7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 14 votes

Rate A6-7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme X7900 or A6-7000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.