Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition vs Core 2 Extreme QX9300
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2388 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Core 2 Extreme | Intel Core i7EE |
Power efficiency | 2.38 | no data |
Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
Release date | August 2008 (16 years ago) | 19 January 2014 (10 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 2.53 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.53 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
Bus type | no data | DMI |
Bus rate | 1066 MHz | 5 GT/s |
Multiplier | no data | 31 |
L1 cache | 64 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 12 MB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 8 MB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
Die size | 2x 107 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
VID voltage range | 1.05V-1.175V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
Socket | PGA478 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 57 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
AMT | + | no data |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition are enumerated here.
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
Threads | 4 | 8 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 22 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 57 Watt |
Core 2 Extreme QX9300 has 26.7% lower power consumption.
i7-4940MX Extreme Edition, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core i7-4940MX Extreme Edition, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.