Core 2 Extreme QX9300: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Extreme QX9300
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.18

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 provides poor benchmark performance at 1.18% of a leader's which is a 96-core Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX.

Summary

Intel started Core 2 Extreme QX9300 sales on August 2008. This is a Penryn architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 4 cores and 4 threads, and is based on 45 nm manufacturing technology, with a max turbo frequency of 2530 MHz and an unlocked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is PGA478 processor with a TDP of 45 Watt.

Primary details

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in the ranking2371
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Market segmentLaptop
SeriesCore 2 Extreme
Power efficiency2.39of 100.00 (Core Ultra 7 164U)
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)
Threads4
Base clock speed2.53 GHzof 4.7 GHz (FX-9590)
Boost clock speed2.53 GHzof 50 MHz (i486DX-50)
Bus rate1066 MHz
L1 cache64 KBof 80 KB (EPYC 9965)
L2 cache12 MBof 2 MB (Xeon 6980P)
L3 cache0 KBof 1152 MB (EPYC 9684X)
Chip lithography45 nmof 3 nm (Apple M3 Max 16-Core)
Die size2x 107 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cof 110 °C (Atom x7-E3950)
64 bit support+
Windows 11 compatibility-
Unlocked multiplier+
VID voltage range1.05V-1.175V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme QX9300 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2of 8 (Opteron 842)
SocketPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattof 3100 ‑ 4500 (Ryzen 7 7435H)

Technologies and extensions

Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+
Turbo Boost Technology-
Hyper-Threading Technology-
Demand Based Switching-
AMT+
FSB parity-

Security technologies

Processor technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+
EDB+

Virtualization technologies

Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.

VT-x+

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Core 2 Extreme QX9300. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 1.18

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 1805

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 3114

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 10882

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 3780

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 3

Gaming performance

Closest competitors

Core 2 Extreme QX9300's performance relative to its closest rivals among notebook CPUs.


A8-5557M 100
Core 2 Extreme QX9300 100

AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Core 2 Extreme QX9300 is A8-5557M, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 2 positions in our ranking.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Core 2 Extreme QX9300:

A10 Pro-7350B 105.93
A8-5550M 103.39
A8-5557M 100
Core 2 Extreme QX9300 100
A10-5745M 98.31
A8-6410 98.31
A10-4657M 97.46

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Recommended GPUs

People consider these graphics cards to be good for Core 2 Extreme QX9300, according to our PC configuration statistics.

These are the fastest graphics cards for Core 2 Extreme QX9300 in our user configuration statistics. There is a total of 38 configurations using Core 2 Extreme QX9300 in our database.

All comparisons with Core 2 Extreme QX9300

Community ratings

Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.


4.1 91 vote

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX9300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.