Athlon 1200 vs Core 2 Extreme QX6700

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and Athlon 1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2245not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesCore 2 Extreme (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency0.97no data
Architecture codenameKentsfield (2007)Thunderbird C (2000−2001)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)October 2000 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and Athlon 1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data256 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm180 nm
Die sizeno data120 mm2
Number of transistorsno data37 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and Athlon 1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataA
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt66 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6700 and Athlon 1200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 66 Watt

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 176.9% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 1200, on the other hand, has 97% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and Athlon 1200. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and Athlon 1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700
Core 2 Extreme QX6700
AMD Athlon 1200
Athlon 1200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 45 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate Athlon 1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX6700 or Athlon 1200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.