Core 2 Duo U7700 vs Core 2 Duo T8300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T8300
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.93
+244%
Core 2 Duo U7700
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.27

Core 2 Duo T8300 outperforms Core 2 Duo U7700 by a whopping 244% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T8300 and Core 2 Duo U7700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25283143
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency2.512.56
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Merom-2048 (2006−2008)
Release date10 January 2008 (16 years ago)27 July 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$241no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T8300 and Core 2 Duo U7700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.33 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.33 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz533 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cache3 MB2 MB
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors410 Million291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.25V0.8V-0.975V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T8300 and Core 2 Duo U7700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA479,PGA478P
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T8300 and Core 2 Duo U7700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T8300 and Core 2 Duo U7700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T8300 and Core 2 Duo U7700 are enumerated here.

VT-x++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T8300 0.93
+244%
Core 2 Duo U7700 0.27

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T8300 1472
+243%
Core 2 Duo U7700 429

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo T8300 2626
+96.7%
Core 2 Duo U7700 1335

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo T8300 4837
+92.3%
Core 2 Duo U7700 2515

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo T8300 2143
+105%
Core 2 Duo U7700 1047

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.93 0.27
Recency 10 January 2008 27 July 2006
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 10 Watt

Core 2 Duo T8300 has a 244.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Duo U7700, on the other hand, has 250% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Duo T8300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo U7700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T8300 and Core 2 Duo U7700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Core 2 Duo U7700
Core 2 Duo U7700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 267 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Core 2 Duo U7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T8300 or Core 2 Duo U7700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.