Celeron G4900 vs Core 2 Duo SU9300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo SU9300
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.30
Celeron G4900
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 51 Watt
1.49
+397%

Celeron G4900 outperforms Core 2 Duo SU9300 by a whopping 397% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo SU9300 and Celeron G4900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31092156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.95
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Celeron
Power efficiency2.862.78
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date20 August 2008 (16 years ago)3 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$42

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo SU9300 and Celeron G4900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate800 MHz4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data31
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache3 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cache6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size107 mm2126 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1.05V-1.15Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo SU9300 and Celeron G4900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA9561151
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt51 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SU9300 and Celeron G4900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo SU9300 and Celeron G4900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SU9300 and Celeron G4900 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo SU9300 and Celeron G4900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 610

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo SU9300 and Celeron G4900.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 1.49
Recency 20 August 2008 3 April 2018
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 51 Watt

Core 2 Duo SU9300 has 410% lower power consumption.

Celeron G4900, on the other hand, has a 396.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron G4900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo SU9300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo SU9300 is a notebook processor while Celeron G4900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SU9300 and Celeron G4900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300
Core 2 Duo SU9300
Intel Celeron G4900
Celeron G4900

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo SU9300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 118 votes

Rate Celeron G4900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo SU9300 or Celeron G4900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.