EPYC 7702P vs Core 2 Duo L7300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo L7300
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.34
EPYC 7702P
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 200 Watt
39.85
+11621%

EPYC 7702P outperforms Core 2 Duo L7300 by a whopping 11621% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo L7300 and EPYC 7702P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking307764
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.68
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesCore 2 DuoAMD EPYC
Power efficiency1.8918.84
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release dateno data7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,425

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo L7300 and EPYC 7702P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Base clock speed1.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz3.35 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
Multiplierno data20
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB L2 Cache256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.975V-1.062Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo L7300 and EPYC 7702P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPBGA479TR4
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo L7300 and EPYC 7702P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo L7300 and EPYC 7702P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo L7300 and EPYC 7702P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo L7300 and EPYC 7702P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo L7300 0.34
EPYC 7702P 39.85
+11621%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo L7300 536
EPYC 7702P 63300
+11710%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 39.85
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 128
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 200 Watt

Core 2 Duo L7300 has 1076.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7702P, on the other hand, has a 11620.6% higher aggregate performance score, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7702P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo L7300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo L7300 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7702P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo L7300 and EPYC 7702P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo L7300
Core 2 Duo L7300
AMD EPYC 7702P
EPYC 7702P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 2 Duo L7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 33 votes

Rate EPYC 7702P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo L7300 or EPYC 7702P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.