Xeon W-3175X vs Celeron U3400

Primary details

Comparing Celeron U3400 and Xeon W-3175X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	not rated	218
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	13.25
Market segment	Laptop	Server
Series	Intel Celeron	Intel Xeon W
Power efficiency	no data	8.68
Architecture codename	Westmere (2010−2011)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release date	24 May 2010 (14 years ago)	19 December 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$2,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Celeron U3400 and Xeon W-3175X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads	2	56
Base clock speed	1.06 GHz	3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed	0.07 GHz	3.8 GHz
Bus type	DMI 1.0	DMI 3.0
Bus rate	1 × 2.5 GT/s	4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier	8	31
L1 cache	128 KB	64K (per core)
L2 cache	512 KB	1 MB (per core)
L3 cache	2 MB	38.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	32 nm	14 nm
Die size	81 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	85 °C
Number of transistors	382 Million	8,000 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+
Unlocked multiplier	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron U3400 and Xeon W-3175X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket	BGA1288	FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	255 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron U3400 and Xeon W-3175X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI	-	+
FMA	+	-
AVX	-	+
vPro	no data	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Speed Shift	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	+
TSX	-	+
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
PAE	36 Bit	no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	no data	-
FDI	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data

Security technologies

Celeron U3400 and Xeon W-3175X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	+
EDB	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron U3400 and Xeon W-3175X are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron U3400 and Xeon W-3175X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3-800	DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size	8 GB	512 GB
Max memory channels	2	6
Maximum memory bandwidth	12.799 GB/s	128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support	-	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors	no data
Clear Video	+	no data
Graphics max frequency	500 MHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron U3400 and Xeon W-3175X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

2

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron U3400 and Xeon W-3175X.

PCIe version	2.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	16	48

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	24 May 2010	19 December 2018
Physical cores	2	28
Threads	2	56
Chip lithography	32 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	255 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron U3400 and Xeon W-3175X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---