Xeon W-3175X vs Celeron U3400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron U3400 and Xeon W-3175X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated208
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data15.94
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Xeon W
Architecture codenameWestmere (2010−2011)Skylake (server) (2017−2019)
Release date24 May 2010 (14 years ago)8 October 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron U3400 and Xeon W-3175X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads256
Base clock speed1.06 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier831
L1 cache128 KB1.75 MB
L2 cache512 KB28 MB
L3 cache2 MB38.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C85 °C
Number of transistors382 Million8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron U3400 and Xeon W-3175X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA1288FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt255 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron U3400 and Xeon W-3175X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron U3400 and Xeon W-3175X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron U3400 and Xeon W-3175X are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron U3400 and Xeon W-3175X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size8 GB512 GB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron U3400 and Xeon W-3175X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron U3400 and Xeon W-3175X.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1648

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron U3400 516
Xeon W-3175X 37167
+7103%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron U3400 176
Xeon W-3175X 1466
+733%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron U3400 313
Xeon W-3175X 14191
+4434%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 May 2010 8 October 2018
Physical cores 2 28
Threads 2 56
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 255 Watt

Celeron U3400 has 1316.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3175X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron U3400 and Xeon W-3175X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron U3400 is a notebook processor while Xeon W-3175X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron U3400 and Xeon W-3175X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron U3400
Celeron U3400
Intel Xeon W-3175X
Xeon W-3175X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 30 votes

Rate Celeron U3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 118 votes

Rate Xeon W-3175X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron U3400 or Xeon W-3175X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.