Xeon E-2456 vs Celeron T1700

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron T1700
2008
35 Watt
0.68
Xeon E-2456
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 80 Watt
15.25
+2143%

Xeon E-2456 outperforms Celeron T1700 by a whopping 2143% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron T1700 and Xeon E-2456 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2733471
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data93.01
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency1.8017.71
Architecture codenameno dataRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date1 October 2008 (16 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$375

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron T1700 and Xeon E-2456 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data6 (Hexa-Core)
Threadsno data12
Base clock speed1.83 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speedno data5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data16 GT/s
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data163 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range1.075V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron T1700 and Xeon E-2456 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron T1700 and Xeon E-2456. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-2
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron T1700 and Xeon E-2456 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron T1700 and Xeon E-2456 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron T1700 and Xeon E-2456. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron T1700 and Xeon E-2456.

PCIe versionno data5
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron T1700 0.68
Xeon E-2456 15.25
+2143%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron T1700 1058
Xeon E-2456 23770
+2147%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 15.25
Recency 1 October 2008 14 December 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 80 Watt

Celeron T1700 has 128.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2456, on the other hand, has a 2142.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 15 years.

The Xeon E-2456 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron T1700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron T1700 is a notebook processor while Xeon E-2456 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron T1700 and Xeon E-2456, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron T1700
Celeron T1700
Intel Xeon E-2456
Xeon E-2456

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Celeron T1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E-2456 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron T1700 or Xeon E-2456, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.