Turion 64 ML-28 vs Celeron N6211

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N6211 and Turion 64 ML-28 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2195not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.33no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesElkhart LakeTurion 64
Power efficiency20.53no data
Architecture codenameElkhart Lake (2022)Lancaster (2005−2006)
Release date17 July 2022 (2 years ago)June 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$54no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N6211 and Turion 64 ML-28 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache1.5 MB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography10 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data125 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data114 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N6211 and Turion 64 ML-28 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA1493754
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Turion 64 ML-28. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Turion 64 ML-28. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N6211 2245
+784%
Turion 64 ML-28 254

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron N6211 2696
+124%
Turion 64 ML-28 1201

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 10 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron N6211 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 800% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N6211 and Turion 64 ML-28. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron N6211 is a desktop processor while Turion 64 ML-28 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N6211 and Turion 64 ML-28, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211
AMD Turion 64 ML-28
Turion 64 ML-28

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Turion 64 ML-28 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N6211 or Turion 64 ML-28, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.