EPYC Embedded 3151 vs Celeron N6211

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N6211 and EPYC Embedded 3151 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2215not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.33no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesElkhart LakeAMD EPYC Embedded
Power efficiency20.53no data
Architecture codenameElkhart Lake (2022)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date17 July 2022 (2 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$54no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N6211 and EPYC Embedded 3151 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.9 GHz
Multiplierno data27
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data213 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N6211 and EPYC Embedded 3151 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA1493AMD BGA SP4r2
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and EPYC Embedded 3151. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N6211 and EPYC Embedded 3151 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and EPYC Embedded 3151. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2666
Maximum memory sizeno data512 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (250 - 750 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N6211 and EPYC Embedded 3151.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data32

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 July 2022 21 February 2018
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron N6211 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 650% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 3151, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N6211 and EPYC Embedded 3151. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron N6211 is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 3151 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N6211 and EPYC Embedded 3151, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211
AMD EPYC Embedded 3151
EPYC Embedded 3151

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC Embedded 3151 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N6211 or EPYC Embedded 3151, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.