Atom Z605 vs Celeron N6211
Primary details
Comparing Celeron N6211 and Atom Z605 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2218 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.33 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Elkhart Lake | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 20.50 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Elkhart Lake (2022) | Lincroft (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 17 July 2022 (2 years ago) | 4 May 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $54 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron N6211 and Atom Z605 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | cDMI |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 10 |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 65.2526 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 70 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 140 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron N6211 and Atom Z605 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | BGA1493 | Intel BGA 518 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6.5 Watt | 2.2 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Atom Z605. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Atom Z605. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR1, DDR2 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 3.2 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (250 - 750 MHz) | PowerVR SGX535 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 July 2022 | 4 May 2010 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 2 Watt |
Celeron N6211 has an age advantage of 12 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.
Atom Z605, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron N6211 and Atom Z605. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron N6211 is a desktop processor while Atom Z605 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N6211 and Atom Z605, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
