Atom E3826 vs Celeron N6211

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N6211
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.40
+637%
Atom E3826
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.19

Celeron N6211 outperforms Atom E3826 by a whopping 637% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N6211 and Atom E3826 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22213252
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.33no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesElkhart LakeAtom
Power efficiency20.532.59
Architecture codenameElkhart Lake (2022)Bay Trail-I (2013)
Release date17 July 2022 (2 years ago)8 October 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$54no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N6211 and Atom E3826 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.47 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography10 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N6211 and Atom E3826 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA1493Intel BGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt7 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Atom E3826. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Atom E3826. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (250 - 750 MHz)Intel HD Graphics

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N6211 1.40
+637%
Atom E3826 0.19

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N6211 2245
+638%
Atom E3826 304

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.40 0.19
Integrated graphics card 1.40 0.77
Recency 17 July 2022 8 October 2013
Chip lithography 10 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 7 Watt

Celeron N6211 has a 636.8% higher aggregate performance score, 81.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, a 120% more advanced lithography process, and 16.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N6211 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom E3826 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron N6211 is a desktop processor while Atom E3826 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N6211 and Atom E3826, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211
Intel Atom E3826
Atom E3826

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom E3826 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N6211 or Atom E3826, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.