A6-3410MX vs Celeron N6211

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N6211
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.41
+76.3%
A6-3410MX
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
0.80

Celeron N6211 outperforms A6-3410MX by an impressive 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N6211 and A6-3410MX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21952605
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.33no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesElkhart LakeAMD A-Series
Power efficiency20.531.68
Architecture codenameElkhart Lake (2022)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date17 July 2022 (2 years ago)14 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$54no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N6211 and A6-3410MX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.2 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography10 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data228 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N6211 and A6-3410MX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA1493FS1
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and A6-3410MX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N6211 and A6-3410MX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and A6-3410MX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)AMD Radeon HD 6520G

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N6211 1.41
+76.3%
A6-3410MX 0.80

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N6211 2245
+77.8%
A6-3410MX 1263

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron N6211 2696
+57.9%
A6-3410MX 1707

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Celeron N6211 4693
A6-3410MX 5568
+18.6%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Celeron N6211 49.66
A6-3410MX 22.15
+124%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Celeron N6211 2
A6-3410MX 2
+22.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.41 0.80
Integrated graphics card 1.39 0.77
Recency 17 July 2022 14 June 2011
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 10 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron N6211 has a 76.3% higher aggregate performance score, 80.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 11 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 650% lower power consumption.

A6-3410MX, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Celeron N6211 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-3410MX in performance tests.

Note that Celeron N6211 is a desktop processor while A6-3410MX is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N6211 and A6-3410MX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211
AMD A6-3410MX
A6-3410MX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 45 votes

Rate A6-3410MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N6211 or A6-3410MX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.