Processor N200 vs Celeron N5105

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N5105
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
2.55
+63.5%
Processor N200
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.56

Celeron N5105 outperforms Processor N200 by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N5105 and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17482122
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency24.1324.61
Architecture codenameJasper Lake (2021)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$193

Detailed specifications

Celeron N5105 and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N5105 and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1338Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N5105 and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N5105 and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N5105 and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N5105 and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency800 MHzno data
Execution Units24no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N5105 and Processor N200 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N5105 and Processor N200 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N5105 and Processor N200 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N5105 and Processor N200.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanes89
USB revision2.0/3.2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports14no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N5105 2.55
+63.5%
Processor N200 1.56

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Celeron N5105 368
+68%
Processor N200 219

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Celeron N5105 108
Processor N200 113
+4.5%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Celeron N5105 2080
+35.1%
Processor N200 1540

Blender(-)

Celeron N5105 1573
Processor N200 2150
+36.7%

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Celeron N5105 653
Processor N200 928
+42.1%

7-Zip Single

Celeron N5105 3108
Processor N200 3230
+3.9%

7-Zip

Celeron N5105 11153
+56.1%
Processor N200 7146

WebXPRT 3

Celeron N5105 134
Processor N200 171
+27.6%

CrossMark Overall

Celeron N5105 531
Processor N200 614
+15.6%

Blender v3.3 Classroom CPU(-)

Celeron N5105 2940
Processor N200 4297
+46.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.55 1.56
Integrated graphics card 5.58 3.29
Recency 11 January 2021 3 January 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron N5105 has a 63.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 69.6% faster integrated GPU.

Processor N200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N5105 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron N5105 is a desktop processor while Processor N200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N5105 and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N5105
Celeron N5105
Intel Processor N200
Processor N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 701 vote

Rate Celeron N5105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 148 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N5105 or Processor N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.