Atom x7809C vs Celeron N5095A

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N5095A and Atom x7809C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1716not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency16.35no data
Architecture codenameJasper Lake (2021)Amston Lake (2024)
Release date1 July 2021 (3 years ago)8 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$117

Detailed specifications

Celeron N5095A and Atom x7809C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB2 MB (per module)
L3 cache4 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N5095A and Atom x7809C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketBGA1338Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N5095A and Atom x7809C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N5095A and Atom x7809C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N5095A and Atom x7809C are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N5095A and Atom x7809C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD GraphicsN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units16no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N5095A and Atom x7809C integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N5095A and Atom x7809C integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N5095A and Atom x7809C integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N5095A and Atom x7809C.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanes89
USB revision2.0/3.2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports14no data
Integrated LAN-no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2021 8 April 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

Celeron N5095A has 66.7% lower power consumption.

Atom x7809C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N5095A and Atom x7809C. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron N5095A is a desktop processor while Atom x7809C is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N5095A and Atom x7809C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N5095A
Celeron N5095A
Intel Atom x7809C
Atom x7809C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 97 votes

Rate Celeron N5095A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom x7809C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N5095A or Atom x7809C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.