Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs Celeron N5095

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N5095
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.57
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
47.63
+1753%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX outperforms Celeron N5095 by a whopping 1753% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N5095 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking172940
Place by popularity30not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency16.2116.10
Architecture codenameJasper Lake (2021)Chagall PRO (2022)
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)8 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N5095 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed2 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz4.5 GHz
Multiplierno data36
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB128 MB
Chip lithography10 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data4x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N5095 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1338WRX8
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N5095 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics-
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHz-
Execution Units16-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N5095 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+-
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@60Hz-
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hz-
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hz-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12-
OpenGL4.5-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N5095 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanes8128
USB revision2.0/3.2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports14no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N5095 2.57
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 47.63
+1753%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N5095 4078
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 75654
+1755%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.57 47.63
Recency 11 January 2021 8 March 2022
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 4 64
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 280 Watt

Celeron N5095 has 1766.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, on the other hand, has a 1753.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5095 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron N5095 is a desktop processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N5095 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N5095
Celeron N5095
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1443 votes

Rate Celeron N5095 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 34 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N5095 or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.