Celeron G6900 vs N5095

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N5095
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.57
Celeron G6900
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 46 Watt
2.86
+11.3%

Celeron G6900 outperforms Celeron N5095 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N5095 and Celeron G6900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17441673
Place by popularity39not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Jasper Lakeno data
Power efficiency16.215.88
Architecture codenameJasper Lake (2021)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron N5095 and Celeron G6900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N5095 and Celeron G6900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1338FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N5095 and Celeron G6900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vPro-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron N5095 and Celeron G6900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N5095 and Celeron G6900 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N5095 and Celeron G6900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 710
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency750 MHz1.3 GHz
Execution Units1616

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N5095 and Celeron G6900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron N5095 and Celeron G6900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@60Hz4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2160@60Hz5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2160@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N5095 and Celeron G6900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N5095 and Celeron G6900.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes820
USB revision2.0/3.2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports14no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron N5095 2.57
Celeron G6900 2.86
+11.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron N5095 4078
Celeron G6900 4549
+11.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.57 2.86
Integrated graphics card 5.58 2.85
Recency 11 January 2021 4 January 2022
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 46 Watt

Celeron N5095 has 95.8% faster integrated GPU, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 206.7% lower power consumption.

Celeron G6900, on the other hand, has a 11.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 11 months.

The Celeron G6900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N5095 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N5095 and Celeron G6900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N5095
Celeron N5095
Intel Celeron G6900
Celeron G6900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1452 votes

Rate Celeron N5095 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 169 votes

Rate Celeron G6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N5095 or Celeron G6900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.